The magnitude of the president’s response on the TJRC report; the 10 billion shillings Fund to be used for restorative justice should be executed.

TJRC-Image final

On 3rd May 2013, the Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC) presented its final report to President Uhuru Kenyatta. The TJRC recommended that the President issue an official, public and unconditional apology to women, children and minority and indigenous communities in Kenya whose rights were grossly violated and for the State’s systematic discrimination against these groups and communities. Despite the president’s dalliance in conveying the apologies which were to be done within six months of the issuance of the TJRC report, he finally did recognized the report on Thursday, 26, March, 2015 during the State of the Nation address.
He did mention that he had instructed Treasury to establish a 10 billion shillings Fund over the next three years to be used for restorative justice. In addition, for the first time the president apologized to the public. “To move forward as one nation … I stand before you today on my own behalf, that of my government and all past governments, to offer the sincere apology of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to all our compatriots for all past wrongs… I seek your forgiveness and may God give us the Grace to draw on the lessons of this history… to unite as a people and, together … embrace our future as one people and one nation…”
Established in the aftermath of the harrowing events of the 2007/2008 post-election violence, the TJRC was tasked with inquiring into gross violations of human rights and historical injustices that occurred in Kenya between independence on 12th December 1963 and the Coalition Agreement signed on 28th February 2008.
Kituo Cha Sheria seeks to draw your attention to the summarized version of this TJRC report and most particularly on certain recommendations, which include;
1. The government, through the President, to formally acknowledge and apologize to Kenyans for gross violations of human rights for the period between 12 December1963 and 28 February 2008;
2. State security agencies (including the National Police Service, National Defence Forces, and National Intelligence Services) to apologize to Kenyans for gross violations of human rights for the period between 12 December 1963 and 28 February 2008 – e.g. for their involvement in extra-judicial killings, arbitrary and prolonged detention, torture and sexual violence;
3. Judiciary to apologize to Kenyans for failure to address impunity and performing its role of deterrence to prevent perpetration of gross human rights violations for the period between 12 December 1963 and 28 February 2008;
4. Wagalla air strip in Wajir, in consultation with the community, to be made a national monument to commemorate victims of Wagalla Massacre;
5. Nyayo House basement to be made a museum and monument to commemorate victims of torture by State security agents;
6. Implementation Committee to create a sub-committee to call for and consider proposals for memorialization. and for funding commemoration of past violations; and
7. Creation of a National Human Rights Day on 10 December to coincide with International Human Rights Day.
The president’s apology seeks to respond to the first recommendation, we believe that the other recommendations shall be addressed and most particularly recommendation number 7, “creation of a National Human Rights Day on December, 10 to coincide with International Human Rights Day.” We believe that all factors in the interest of pursuing peace, promoting access to justice, and enabling reconciliation will be expedited.
The end product, a report comprising over 2200 pages, is structured into four separate volumes: the first volume (Volume I) provides an account of how the TJRC was formed, how it interpreted its mandate and what challenges were faced whilst carrying out this mandate; the second volume (Volume II), itself divided into three sub-volumes, focuses on the major violations of bodily integrity committed during the mandate period (including unlawful killings and enforced disappearances, unlawful detention, torture and ill-treatment and sexual violence), historical injustices and violations of socio-economic rights, and violations against groups entitled to special protection, including women and children, as well as minority groups and indigenous communities; the third volume (Volume III) addresses issues relating to national unity and reconciliation; and the fourth volume (Volume IV) catalogues the TJRC’s findings and recommendations, including those relating to its implementation mechanism and reparations framework.
Given the lengthy, complex nature of the report, Kituo Cha Sheria through this publication seeks to encapsulate the key issues, findings, and recommendations presented by the TJRC. The purpose of this being to not only recognize the human rights violations perpetrated throughout the mandate period and to date, but to also provide a wider audience with access to pertinent information of this kind and allow for active participation in the reconciliation and healing process of the country.
As the president put it, “The time has come to bring closure to this painful past. …. The time has come to allow ourselves the full benefit of a cohesive, unified and confident Kenya, as we claim our future.”
We also believe that the information in this booklet shall enlighten every citizen to understand the essence of the apology and to urge the president to ensure the instruction to the Treasury to establish a 10 billion shillings Fund over the next three years to be used for restorative justice come to fulfillment. Click here to download the TJRC report http://kituochasheria.or.ke/gallery/publications/english-publications/

 

By; Kituo Team.

Insecurity and its Effect on Basic Rights and Access to Justice

The recent massacre in Garissa, previous terror attacks, banditry and other security risks in the country leave in their wake a bad taste in the mouths of Kenyans with the realization that the provision by the law, local and international, of the right to security is not enough anymore.
The right to security of the person as guaranteed by Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees or rather provides for the right to security of the person. It also provides for the right to life and liberty. The right to security of the person is also recognized by the United Nations Treaty, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1996 which provides that everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.
The Constitution of Kenya 2010 also provides for the freedom and security of the person under Article 29. The Right to the security and freedom of person cannot exist on its own as there are other rights that affect and are affected by this right.
This article seeks to delve into the effects these events and risks have on the basic rights of the Kenyan citizen.
Right to Life
The Constitution of Kenya under Article 26 provides for the right to life. Every Kenyan citizen has a right to be protected if his or her life is at risk. The threat of terrorism in Kenya is very real going by the trends and as such the government is at liberty and has a duty to each and every citizen to ensure that their right to life is well safeguarded and protected. As such there ought to be elaborate measures to ensure the safety of each and every Kenyan.
With each terror attack, banditry or any other security lapse in the country, a citizen’s right to life is violated. In matters security it is safe to say that the government bears the sole responsibility to ensure that its citizens’ rights are protected from all factors that threaten, infringe or extinguish this right from within and without. How? By use of the various security mechanisms that are necessary to ensure extensive gathering of intelligence, rightful use of resources allocated to security agencies, zero tolerance to corruption, abiding to the rule of law and most of all ensuring that the country has well trained personnel to tackle the threat.
So far, the measures if any; have failed more than they have succeeded, in convincing the Kenyan citizens that their constitutional right to life is safeguarded and citizens are no longer at ease.
Property and Employment Rights
The Constitution of Kenya gives every person the right to freedom of movement and every citizen the right to enter, remain in and reside anywhere in Kenya. This right especially for the civil servants in Northern Kenya and other citizens who may have interests in property or invested there has of late proven elusive.
Every person has a right to work and live or own property anywhere in the country. Insecurity is an impediment to this right as it prevents a person from making meaningful living or earning a living in his or her place of work if this place of work lies within these attack prone regions of our country.
The right to security if lacking will not only affect other people but also the local communities in the affected areas. Insecurity extinguishes employment, investment and development opportunities in the affected areas. While it may affect the non-locals working there, it adversely affects the local community and may even lead to increased breeding room for other attackers. “Hopelessness is a dangerous thing”, they say.
Freedom of Worship
This is at the epicenter of the narrative of most terror attacks. Kenya has a majority of Christians at almost 80%. This notwithstanding, the threat of terrorism is proving to be a great headache for Christians and peace loving Muslims as terrorist propagate their divisive agenda. As provided by Article 32 of the Constitution, every person has the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion.
Due to insecurity threats and attacks, primarily ethnic Somalis have unfortunately been harassed, profiled, discriminated against, and generally found it hard to access several services, gain employment, get identification documents among others. The freedom of religion in this instance is greatly compromised for both Christians and Muslims alike.
Though a fundamental right therefore, religious affiliation is adversely affected when the right to security is infringed upon or threatened. Especially when religion is used as a scapegoat for committing such atrocities as recently witnessed.

Right to Health and Education
The Constitution of Kenya Article 43 (a) and (f) respectively provides that every person has the right to the highest attainable standard of health, which includes the right to healthcare services, including reproductive healthcare and the right to education.
The world witnessed the macabre sight of the Al-Shabaab terror group massacring 147 young Kenyans in their campus. Their Constitutional rights to education and life were snuffed at once by the state’s systematic failures on security.
Besides that the country also witnessed similar inhumane killings on a bus full of mostly teachers who were travelling home for holiday and the subsequent back and forth on whether these same teachers could resume duty. With the killings of mostly Christians this form of terrorist agenda and insecurity not only drives out people from institutions like schools and hospitals in the affected region but also hinder the locals, mostly Muslims, from accessing their rights.

Conclusion
It is important to note that whether insecurity is fuelled by religious extremism or banditry or any other form of attacks on the citizenry whether from within or without, the rights guaranteed by the Constitution affect both the targeted and the untargeted. The real question is; is the provision on these rights sufficient?

Kenya as a country must ensure that in order to safeguard these rights, our infrastructure, our politics, our development agenda, our policing, our systems and our resources are not the driving force that keeps these vices up and running. End corruption, discrimination, petty and divisive politics, marginalization and profiling.

Let’s embrace oneness. One Kenya.

BY BRIDAH N. KIMATHI

Kituo restores the dwindling hopes of desperate Mercy Njeri…

njeri final“Kituo is like the Good Samaritan in Luke 10:30-35 NIV Bible, they rescued me from a scratch, they stabilized my dwindling hopes.” These were words genuinely articulated by Mercy Njeri Mwangi as she receives the order from Kituo Lawyer, Simon Kimondolo issued at the Nairobi Environment and Land Court (ELC). The order that guaranteed her ownership of her forcefully sold plot was granted by Judge Mary M. Gitumbi on April, 10, 2015. Mercy Njeri through Kituo’s assistance filed a case on January, 23, 2014. Her story and encounters with Kituo Cha Sheria unfolds as follows;
About her case…
So as to attain Justice and what is rightfully yours, one has to be patient and persistent. Mercy Njeri was married to Peter Mwangi Muchoki in December 1986 and they were blessed with three children. At the existence of their marriage, through their great exertion, they jointly bought a plot from the City Council of Nairobi whereof they constructed 12 houses, lived on some and rented out the others for their income.
Sometimes in 2008, their marriage began experiencing turbulence and thus they separated. It is during this time that the then husband started mistreating the family and even assaulting her. In the year 2010, Mary complained at the Chief’s office that Mwangi was collecting the rent from all rooms and spending all of it without giving the family anything for their basic needs.
The Chief and the area leaders arbitrated on the matter whereby the parties agreed to divide equally the plot and each to have 6 rooms to be collecting rent from. Mary was therefore able to get an income of Kshs 8,300/= per month from the houses she was collecting rent and which went a great mile in assisting her and the children meet their basic needs.
In 2011, Mary got an accident and was admitted at Kenyatta National Hospital. During her hospitalization, Mwangi took advantage of the situation and sold the entire plot including Mary’s 6 rooms to Edward Mwangi Macharia who was their neighbor. Mary tried to stop the deal from her hospital bed but she could not. Macharia assumed ownership of the plot and started collecting rent from all the 12 houses from November 2011 and even changed the ownership documents at the Nairobi City County to reflect him as the owner. Still groaning in hospital, Mary sent her elder son to go and check, hoping the then husband could even show mercy to the son. The son came back mesmerized and only uttered “Mum, all is gone the neighbour is collecting the rent, he says the plot we have been collecting the rent from belongs to him and I cannot find daddy!”
At this moment in life if you were Mary what would you do? When all is gone and nothing left to keep her going with the children who needed clothes, food, shelter and school fees. In crutches, having nothing to even settle her hospital bill, she was disillusioned!
Her encounter with Kituo Cha Sheria…
Embittered and all hopes vanishing, Mary did not know what to do; she decided to seek legal assistance on the matter of the accident. A police officer had earlier proposed to try and get assistance from Kituo Cha Sheria. She came to Kituo as was directed, very optimistic to get help. She was received and directed to Kituo Gardens waiting to be attended to. This is where she overheard a conversation by other clients at the waiting shed; the client whom she did not know was telling his fellow how Kituo rescued his property from a grabber who used his wealth and money to bribe every avenue just to own his small piece of land.
Mary felt this is an opportunity to grab, “I must tell whoever will attend to me my predicament,” she said to herself.
She met Nathan Kivungi and Simon Kimondolo who derived two matters from her situation; that which concerns the accident and another on the selling of the plot. Mary did not have money at all so Kituo assisted her apply to be allowed to sue as a pauper (an impoverished person) on the matter that involves her houses and the order to that effect was issued in 2013.
Later Kituo assisted her in filing the ELC case on January, 23, 2014 and Kituo lawyers represented her in Court following up the matter to the latter in ensuring justice is granted.

The Judgement.

The matter was fully heard and the judgment delivered on 10th April 2015. The judge gave the following orders:
i. That the plaintiff is entitled to half share of the suit property being the plot.
ii. General damages for trespass in the sum of Ksh. 100,000/=
iii. Lost income of Ksh. 8,300/= per month from November 2011 until payment in full.
iv. Edward Mwangi Macharia is given 30 days from the date of the judgment to vacate the Mary’s half share, 6 rooms of the Plot
v. Interests at court rates.

Mary was so happy to get back her lawful property and in addition a total sum of Ksh. 448,600 thus Ksh. 348,600 as compensation for lost income since November 2011 to April 2015 (42months) and further Ksh. 100,000 being general damages for trespass. Further, the Judgment in effect has restored her ownership meaning that as from the month of May 2015 onwards, she will be collecting her usual rent of Ksh. 8,300 per month or more from her 6 houses.
“I am grateful to Kituo Cha Sheria; you have restored hopes to the hopeless,” she acclaimed to Simon Kimondolo, Kituo’s lawyer who represented her throughout the Court sessions as she collected the Courts order.
Kituo Cha Sheria, “We Care for Justice”

By Nandia Paul- RCD

Your labour is never in vain, it should be appreciated

kibera         From right (Mr. Alex Karanja from Autodrome Services Limited,
Mr Stanslaus Alusiola, Kibera Community Justice Centre Coordinator,
Lesayon Saigor, and Jairo Sila, Kituo Cha Sheria.

“No work is insignificant. All labor that uplifts humanity has dignity and importance and should be undertaken with painstaking excellence” by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
It is imperative to understand and know your labour rights; this can be found from the Kituo Cha Sheria’s (Kituo) Publication titled the Kenyan Worker and the Law, an information booklet on labour law. The Employment Act, 2007 clearly stipulates the terms and condition of engagement between the Employer and employee sections 8,9 and 10 of the Act talks about the contract of service whether written or oral.
The encounter by Kituo’s paralegal officer, Mr Stanslaus Alusiola clearly shows how employers exploit their employees especially the poor and marginalized who may be ignorant of their rights. If it were not for Kituo’s Kibera Community Justice Centre the ignorant Lesayon Saigor who did not even know the name of his employer could have had nothing to smile about, his story should act as a bridge to fight against impunity and injustices encountered in the employment sector.
Lesayon Saigor was employed as a guard in Autodrome Services Limited in Westlands since October 2013. He remained diligent to his work oblivious of what awaits him. He encountered his mayhem on 5th of March, 2015 at around 11.00pm in the night when he was dismissed without any notice. The company had not paid him some of his dues for the service and sacrifice he had made to them. He was not very familiar with the steps to undertake to mitigate this situation. He pleaded with the company to pay him his dues but the company could hear none of his pleas. He sought to seek legal assistance from Kituo’s Kibera Community Justice Centre where he met the Coordinator, Mr. Stanslaus Alusiola on March 11, 2015. With the vast experience in Paralegalism, the Coordinator deemed the matter a gross violation of the employee’s right by the employer. He immediately resorted to taking action in ensuring justice is done. He decided to write to Saigor’s boss to seek clarification on the matter and assist his new client, Saigor. They never responded to the letter. Mr Alusiola therefore decided to visit the company with a demand letter citing legal aspects on the labour law to prove violation of Mr. Saigor’s labour rights. Kituo through its able advocates were ready to move to Court to file suit if the Demand did not bear fruit. However, the company manager accepted to settle the matter out of Court and agreed to pay Saigor all his dues with immediate effect.
Later on, the Community Justice Coordinator received a phone call from the Autodrome Services Limited Company claiming that they have to do some deductions of which the management did not explain. A matter that the Coordinator strongly refuted due to the fact that the guard was arrogantly dismissed at night endangering his life, was not given any notice and received not his final dues. He opted to pursue the matter and ensure justice is done.
Accepting defeat, the company through the manager, Mr. Alex Karanja pleaded to settle the matter without involving Court and accepted to pay all the dues without any deductions to the employee by 9th of April 2015.
Lesayon Saigor was all the smiles and thanked Kituo Cha Sheria and more so Kibera Community Justice Center Coordinator, Mr Stanslaus Alusiola for the relentless effort in ensuring he is accorded his dues.
“I am happy today, I can use this money to stabilize myself as I seek for a job elsewhere, thank you Kituo Cha Sheria,” he acclaimed!

Kituo Cha Sheria, We Care for Justice,
by Nandia Paul- RCD

 

Understand how you should Represent yourself in Criminal Matters

self rep photo

This booklet seeks to provide Kenyans with information about their rights in criminal proceedings.
The rights in this manual are premised on the provisions of the Bill of Rights in the Kenyan Constitution and related legislation.
It is our hope that this information will enable Kenyans to exercise their rights and will promote the respect of the rights highlighted in this manual. In summary, the booklet highlights various issues which includes;
Criminal Procedure:
Criminal Proceedings- A criminal proceeding is a public dispute. In such a proceeding, the State prosecutes a person for committing a crime on behalf of the public. A criminal proceeding is different from a civil proceeding because civil proceedings generally involve disputes between two private individuals, one of whom is seeking compensation from the other.
When you are arrested, criminal proceedings begin. The process continues until you are found innocent or guilty of a crime. If you are found guilty, the proceedings may continue if you decide to appeal the decision.

The rights of an arrested person and procedure for arrest
Reason for Arrest, Identification of the Arresting Person, Right to be Treated in a Humane Way, Touching or Confining of the Arrested Person, Use of Force In Carrying Out an Arrest, Right to Remain Silent, Right to Be Held Separately, Right to be Brought to Court As Soon As Reasonably Possible

Who has the power to arrest?
Citizen, Law Enforcement Officer, the Chief, Magistrates and Order of a Court.

Other covered topics include:

 Procedure at the police station
 Tips if you are being arrested and brought to the police station
 Procedure in court
 Prosecution
 Trial process and much more

Note that the Kiswahili translation (Kijitabu cha habari kuhusu haki za mfungwa katika maswala ya jinai) is from page 33 of this book; Click here to read more http://kituochasheria.or.ke/gallery/publications/english-publications/

Kituo Team, We Care for Justice.

Kituo Empowers Turkana Paralegals

DSC01441-turkana            Participants pause for a group photo during the Turkana

Paralegal training in Lokichar,Turkana County 

 

Kituo Cha Sheria(KITUO) with support from MacArthur Foundation has been implementing a project on environmental and human rights protection as a result of oil production in Turkana County.

A baseline survey and MTE carried out on this project revealed a number of critical environmental and human rights issues in the extractive industry that require much attention. In order to address some of the human rights issues identified above, it was proposed that awareness on issues such as land, labour and environmental rights be created so as to empower local communities to demand for transparency and accountability with regards to oil exploration.
In furthering the objectives above, KITUO facilitated paralegal training for Turkana paralegals in Lokichar, Turkana County from 10th to 14th March 2015. 30 participants, 20 male and 10 female were trained. The training was spearheaded by Kituo staffs Ashioya Biko and Marcelino Waithaka.

The participants were taken through the following topics:
Brief introduction on Human rights.
Sources of the law in Kenya.
Roles of Community Paralegals.
History and background of the extractive industry in Kenya with emphasis in Oil exploration.
National Energy Policy and analysis of the Petroleum (Exploration and Production) Act.
Drafting of Demand Letters; The paralegals were trained on how to draft a demand letter generally and the importance of drafting it.
Overview of the Current legal regime governing land in Kenya with specific emphasis on Land adjudication and Compulsory acquisition.
An in-depth look at the draft Community Land Bill
Discussions on the establishment of proposed Kituo Community Justice Centre in Turkana.

 

KITUO TEAM – WE CARE FOR JUSTICE!

KITUO EMPOWERS PRISON WARDERS

Madam Wanini Kireri, Senior Deputy Commissioner of Prisons hands over a certificate to a participant

Madam Wanini Kireri, Senior Deputy Commissioner of Prisons hands over a certificate to a participant

KITUO enhanced her long standing partnership with the Kenya Prisons department by facilitating a paralegal training for prison warders in conjunction with Faraja Foundation from 23rd to 27th March 2015. This training workshop was held at Our Lady Queen of Peace Catholic Church, South B. 40 prison warders drawn from the following remand facilities underwent paralegal training; Athi River, Kangeta(Meru), Kiambu, Kitui, Langata, Makueni Remand, Nairobi Medium, Nairobi Remand, Narok, and Thompson Falls Prison. Also in attendance were two staff from Faraja Foundation and 2 legal officers from Prisons’ Human Rights Department Hq.
The training was spearheaded by Kituo officers led by Glenn Ong’uti Mangare, Ashioya Biko, Marcelino Waithaka and Jodom Mwebi. The participants were taken through the following topics:


TOT skills and Adult learning methodologies
Concept of empowerment in HR/Paralegal matters
Understanding basic human rights
Sources of Law in Kenya
Constitutional provisions touching on persons detained, held in custody or imprisoned
U.N Standard Minimum Rules for the treatment of offenders
Rights of arrested persons
The process of Criminal Trial
Ethical issues in paralegal work

The workshop was officially closed on Friday 27th by Madam Wanini Kireri, Senior Deputy Commissioner of Prisons and the Regional Prisons Commander-Nairobi. In her closing remarks, Madam Wanini disclosed that a research conducted late last year indicated that prisons are overpopulated(exceeded their holding capacity) by 80%. “The knowledge and skills in human rights training and paralegal skills imparted is critical in aiding the department in decongesting” added Madam Wanini. In addition, a significant number of remand inmates are not aware of their legal rights and obligations and the knowledge gained would aid in filling this gap. Finally, she presented certificates to participants together with Fr. Peter Meienberg, the Founder of Faraja foundation.

KITUO TEAM – WE CARE FOR JUSTICE!

INVITE TO SUBMIT ARTICLES

INVITE TO SUBMIT ARTICLES.

In promotion of access to justice Kituo Cha Sheria seeks an interactive forum through which the multifaceted aspects of human rights and access to justice are identified, explored and discussed. This exchange of information between actors in this field including activists, students and professionals who create social change shall contribute to an increased knowledge-base among readers, thus promoting the critical importance of justice and equity within society.

Join the Kituo Haki Family! Kituo invites you to submit your publication on ANY Human Rights and Access to Justice issue to be published and shared with readers and our partners through the Kituo: Haki Blog https://kituochasheria.wordpress.com/
Interested contributors may submit their article and a picture of themselves to
info@kituochasheria.or.ke

Articles should range between 400-1000 words and should clearly identify the area of focus and suggest approaches to improved human rights regime and access to justice in society.
Authors of published submissions will receive a Kituo gift hamper.

We Care for Justice!

KITUO SAVES CLIENT FROM JAIL TERM AND FIGHTS FOR HIS LAND RIGHTS

ANOTHER LEGAL AID SUCCESS STORY AS KITUO ASSISTS PETER NDUNG’U NGARUIYA ACCESS JUSTICE

Peter Ndung’u Ngaruiya was facing a malicious case of preparation to commit a felony:- stealing under Section 308 (1) of the Penal Code and which if found guilty carries a minimum sentence of 7 years and a maximum of 14 years imprisonment. The genesis of the matter is his family land located at Naivasha bordering a land owned by a wealthy proprietor with the shared border being a river on which the neighbour decided to construct a water dam. The water dam infrastructure together with the dam itself occupied Peter’s family land but no consent or authority was sought by the neighbour. The wealthy neighbour went ahead to cut down trees from a man-made forest on Peter’s family land and fenced off the said land including a chunk of Peter’s family land. Consequently a dispute arose but efforts to resolve the matter through mechanisms available to the local administration through the Chief’s office who involved the Police failed as the neighbour made use of his resources to influence the outcome.

All along, the neighbour was intimidating the family through arbitrary arrests and detention of Peter on fictitious complaints. At one time, Peter was arrested and charged at a Naivasha Court for allegedly destroying the neighbour’s fence. Although he put up a defence to the fact that the land belonged to his family, the presiding magistrate heard nothing of that and since he had no legal representation; his defence was overruled and he was convicted and jailed for six months. Later on in 2014 this case came up as Engineer Criminal Case No. 171 of 2014 Republic v. Peter Ndung’u Ngaruiya and which according to Peter was just a set up whereof his close cousin was given Kshs 20,000/= to visit his home with a hammer and lure him into a trap and have him arrested and the hammer was to be used as an exhibit to show he was preparing to destroy and steal the neighbour’s chain link fence.

When Peter visited Kituo Cha Sheria offices, Simon Kimondolo took up the matter and instituted a land case at Nakuru-ELC Case No. 199 of 2014 still pending hearing. Counsel also had to intervene in the criminal case having seen the injustice being perpetrated by the wealthy neighbour against Peter and his family who would be considered poor with the sole intention of intimidating them to give up the land case.

After a long process with the case from July 2014, the Judgment was delivered on 31st March 2015 whereof Peter Ndung’u Ngaruiya, our client, was acquitted of the offense under Section 215 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Kituo will pursue the land case with the hope that justice will be done and seen to be done and help resolve the long running dispute as well as restore this family’s dignity.

We Care for Justice